OatsAI

SIGNALS

On-Chain Risk Layers

Signal Weight Distribution
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
Concentration
Liquidity
Contract
Transfer
Dev
1

Concentration

Weight: 30%
Formula
top10_holder_pct → score:
  0–20%  → 80–100  (distributed supply)
  20–50% → 40–80   (moderate concentration)
  50–80% → 5–40    (high concentration)
  >80%   → 0–5     (critical concentration)
Description

Well-distributed supply = manipulation resistance. Top-10 whales controlling 80%+ = rug risk.

Interpretation

Holder concentration is the primary rug-pull indicator. Distributed supply provides manipulation resistance.

2

Liquidity Health

Weight: 25%
Formula
score = clamp(liquidity_to_mcap / 0.10 × 100, 0, 100)

ratio = 0.00 → 0   (no liquidity)
ratio = 0.05 → 50  (thin)
ratio = 0.10+ → 100 (healthy)
Description

Liquidity/market cap ratio. Low ratio = easy to dump, high slippage. Saturates at 10%.

Interpretation

Healthy liquidity allows large trades without massive price impact. Thin liquidity = danger zone.

3

Contract Maturity

Weight: 20%
Formula
contract_age_days → score:
  0d       → 0
  30d      → 30   (early stage)
  90d      → 60   (established)
  180d     → 90   (mature)
  365d+    → 100
Description

Older contracts have survived longer without exit events. New = unproven.

Interpretation

Time in market is a strong trust signal. New contracts are inherently riskier.

4

Transfer Quality

Weight: 15%
Formula
score = clamp(transfer_pattern_score, 0, 100)

0   → wash trading / circular transfers detected
100 → organic, diverse counterparty distribution
Description

Organic transfer patterns indicate real user adoption vs bot-inflated activity.

Interpretation

Wash trading and circular transfers are red flags. Organic distribution indicates genuine adoption.

5

Dev Exposure

Weight: 10%
Formula
score = clamp(100 - dev_wallet_pct / 20 × 100, 0, 100)

dev_pct = 0%  → 100  (no dev exposure)
dev_pct = 5%  → 75
dev_pct = 10% → 50
dev_pct = 20% → 0    (critical)
Description

Dev wallet holdings = single point of failure. Above 20% = critical rug-pull risk.

Interpretation

Large dev holdings create a centralized point of failure. Lower is safer.